FBR Issues Notices to PSO and Six Oil Companies Over Alleged Rs. 10 Billion in Outstanding Levies

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has reportedly issued notices to Pakistan State Oil (PSO) and six other oil companies over the alleged underpayment of nearly Rs. 10 billion in petroleum levy, climate levy, and customs duties on imported petroleum products.

According to publicly available reports, the notices relate to alleged outstanding liabilities associated with imported fuel products.

PSO Receives Largest Reported Notice

Among the companies named, Pakistan State Oil (PSO) reportedly received the largest notice, with alleged outstanding dues of approximately Rs. 8.2 billion.

The other companies mentioned in the reported notices include:

• Puma Energy
• Pak-Arab Pipeline Company
• Hi-Tech Lubricants
• BE Energy
• Taj Gasoline
• Gas & Oil Pakistan

FBR Directs Companies to Respond

According to reports, the FBR has instructed the companies to submit their responses and settle any outstanding liabilities if applicable.

The notices reportedly state that legal action may be initiated if the companies fail to comply with the relevant requirements under applicable tax laws.

Importance of Petroleum Levies and Customs Duties

Petroleum levies, climate levies, and customs duties represent significant sources of government revenue and play an important role in Pakistan's fiscal framework.

Regulatory oversight and tax compliance within the petroleum sector remain key components of revenue collection and financial administration.

What Happens Next?

The companies are expected to respond to the notices through the applicable legal and administrative process.

Any determination regarding the alleged liabilities will be subject to the relevant proceedings and applicable laws.

Stakeholders across Pakistan's energy, taxation, and business sectors will continue to monitor developments as the matter progresses.

Disclaimer: This article is published for informational and news-reporting purposes only and is based on publicly available reports. The allegations described relate to reported notices and should not be interpreted as established findings of liability. Any obligations or disputes remain subject to the applicable legal and administrative process.